CONTACT US 24/7 FOR A CONSULTATION 317-669-8972
CONTACT US 24/7 FOR A CONSULTATION

The Nicholson Nugget Law Blog

The Indiana Supreme Court upheld Attorney Mark Nicholson's motion to dismiss the neglect charges against Kristine Barnett

Posted by Mark Nicholson | Jan 11, 2022 | 0 Comments

Prosecutors Face Uphill Battle After Court Ruling

Kristine Barnett

The saga may be coming to an end on the Ukrainian Adoption case. The Tippecanoe County prosecutors now face an uphill challenge to the neglect of a dependent charges against Kristine Barnett. The Indiana Supreme Court upheld the trial court granting Attorney Mark Nicholson's motion to dismiss the charges.

The Indiana Supreme Court let stand an Appeals Court ruling last week, affirming that the charges must be dismissed against Kristine Barnett if the allegations rely on the daughter's age she adopted, Natalia Barnett, as the basis for the charges. That's because a Marion County court changed Natalia's birth year after Kristine and her then-husband petitioned for the change in 2012.

Changing Natalia's birth year makes her — in the eyes of the courts and for purposes of prosecution — an adult when prosecutors accused Michael and Kristine Barnett of neglecting a child. This is the same legal conclusion reached by the Tippecanoe Superior Court 2 Judge Steve Meyer in his rulings in August 2020. Additionally, Meyer ruled that allegations that happened before 2014 must be dismissed because the statute of limitations expired before charges were filed.

The Appeals Court affirmed both of Meyer's rulings in August 2021, but prosecutors requested the Attorney General's Office petition the Supreme Court, which it did; the Supreme Court decided on Jan. 6 not to take the case.

Attorney Nicholson believes the court got it right and hopes this will end the adult baby case.

To read more about this, please visit Lafayette Journal & Courier.

About the Author

Mark Nicholson
Mark Nicholson

Why is Indiana criminal defense and personal injury attorney Mark Nicholson called the Battery Man? Because his first criminal jury trial was a battery case. The case was called the Big Buford Battery case. They charged his client with throwing a big Buford sandwich at the manager through the drive-thru window. Then, his client went through the drive-thru window and allegedly battered the manager. It was all captured on video.  The verdict: Not Guilty! His first personal injury case was a car accident. He views car accidents as a form of battery. One car hitting (battering) another, although generally unintentional.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Menu